"They’re trying to change the nature of human affairs," said Harry Crouch, president of the National Coalition for Men.ĭo you want your town's high school to teach "yes means yes"? Share your opinion in the comments below. They believe it unjustly requires those accused of assault to prove their innocence by showing they received a clear signal of consent from their partner, rather than keeping to the standard of "innocent until proven guilty." Opponents of the affirmative consent standard argue that it defines consent too narrowly. Supporters maintain that "yes means yes" also makes it clear that a person cannot consent when they are incapacitated, for example from the use of drugs or alcohol.īy promoting a culture where active, clear and ongoing consent is sought by both partners, advocates hope that "yes means yes" education will help prevent rape and assault by providing a clear standard of when it's OK to keep going. For example, the "fight, flight, or freeze" response may cause a victim to freeze rather than try to get out of the situation. Supporters of teaching "yes means yes" argue that the old way of teaching "no means no" leaves too much ambiguity-that there are situations where a person might not be able to verbalize "no" or cannot physically struggle but does not wish to have sex. I would love to be able to have someone talk about Yes means Yes and the restructuring of Womens relationship and role, with and in sex. This year Maryland, Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Nevada have considered similar bills, though none have become law. In 2015 California became the first state to require public schools to teach students that "yes means yes" rather than "no means no." This "affirmative consent standard" teaches that both participants in sex need to actively, preferably verbally consent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |